Right on. I'm thinking that even though this workaround works, things aren't quite as straight-forward when using the FOR-EACH-IN-NEXT statement. Because one is dealing with arrays and OLE collections, how would one "fake-out" the last object + 1 ? By poking the object index internally ?

quit quit eh ? Sometimes I have to say this to my wife and children when the first quit doesn't work

Shawn.

p.s.

Have you written a game for k2k yet ?

Shawn..