Eheh... I guess it was too much to read back, and it was my fault for not updating the info in the proper places, , but I'd already found that... Check my last post on the previous thread.
Using python, I found the 466th one that perl "missed" and the python script took only 21 minutes instead of the 6 hours of the perl version...

That's why I added the 3388 "out of order" in my test program: didn't feel like inserting it into it's "numerical" place and reformating all the lines... [Smile]

{edit} Also, about the parenthesis, this is the current status (for the floating point version):
code:
; Parentheses: 5 needed combinations
;  abcd
;  (ab)(cd)
;  a(bcd)
;  (abc)d
 
;    0 need (ab)cd   \
;    0 need a(bc)d   - 1 solution (1169) needs any one of these!
;    0 need ab(cd)   /
; ------------------
;    1 need (abc)d
; ------------------
;    3 need a(bcd)
;   13 need (ab)(cd)
{/edit}

[ 25. September 2002, 01:08: Message edited by: Fernando Madruga ]
_________________________
Later,   [b]Mad[/b]ruga