#40157 - 2003-05-14 07:00 PM
WKIX32, any issues?
|
j95661
Getting the hang of it
Registered: 2001-02-27
Posts: 84
Loc: sacramento,ca usa
|
I am currently using the standard console version of Kixtart, 4.02. Are there any issues that I need to be aware of if I start using WKIX32, I have searched the board and havent found much info on this.
If anyone can point me to the info I would apprecaite it.
Also I have set my login script to hidden, so Is the WKIX32 going to buy me anything. The window that we see now is from the batch file that initiates my kixtart script.
_________________________
WonderBoy
Constantly learning everyday, how much I dont know :-)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#40158 - 2003-05-14 07:33 PM
Re: WKIX32, any issues?
|
Chris S.
MM club member
   
Registered: 2002-03-18
Posts: 2368
Loc: Earth
|
In the scenario that you are using... - Loginscript initiated from batch file
You will not gain much from using WKIX32 instead of KIX32. The only possible benefit would be hiding the console window a tick or two faster (provided your SetConsole command was early in your script).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#40159 - 2003-05-14 08:29 PM
Re: WKIX32, any issues?
|
Kdyer
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2001-01-03
Posts: 6241
Loc: Tigard, OR
|
BTW, with KIX32 and WKIX32, you don't need to specify KIXTART.KIX, for example. If we look at the switches for WKIX32, we also see the /i for invisible too.
We talked about this here -
MS-Tech Article findings- 318689
Re-Write of the KIX32.EXE Deployment tool
HTH,
Kent
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#40161 - 2003-05-14 09:10 PM
Re: WKIX32, any issues?
|
Chris S.
MM club member
   
Registered: 2002-03-18
Posts: 2368
Loc: Earth
|
I'd be interested in seeing a write-up/FAQ for achieving a batch-less loginscript.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#40164 - 2003-05-14 09:26 PM
Re: WKIX32, any issues?
|
Kdyer
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2001-01-03
Posts: 6241
Loc: Tigard, OR
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#40165 - 2003-05-14 09:32 PM
Re: WKIX32, any issues?
|
Kdyer
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2001-01-03
Posts: 6241
Loc: Tigard, OR
|
All you need is the KIXTART.KIX in the NETLOGON share and when you start WKIX32/KIX32, it will look for it.
However, Doc brought up a good point..
The system will go through: .COM .EXE .BAT
It maybe better to specify WKIX32.EXE, for example.
Kent
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#40170 - 2003-05-15 09:29 AM
Re: WKIX32, any issues?
|
j95661
Getting the hang of it
Registered: 2001-02-27
Posts: 84
Loc: sacramento,ca usa
|
thanks all for the feedback. I wasnt able to hop back online until just now. I will try running my script by using
wkix32.exe ourloginscript.kix
and see how that works, we only have a handfull of 9x boxes and they are only good for boat anchors anyways.
_________________________
WonderBoy
Constantly learning everyday, how much I dont know :-)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#40172 - 2003-05-15 01:57 PM
Re: WKIX32, any issues?
|
Kdyer
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2001-01-03
Posts: 6241
Loc: Tigard, OR
|
Jason,
wkix32.exe ourloginscript.kix will/would work fine..
But, why not rename ourloginscript.kix to be kixtart.kix once the testing phase is complete?
Kent
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#40173 - 2003-05-15 04:42 PM
Re: WKIX32, any issues?
|
j95661
Getting the hang of it
Registered: 2001-02-27
Posts: 84
Loc: sacramento,ca usa
|
I guess it would be better to rename the kix file. I just tried the following this morning
wkix32.exe ourloginscript.kix /i
and that works beautifuly, my login script pops up an Internet explorer window and now it looks very professional. That dos box really took away from the whole look.
If I rename the file I wont be able to put on the /I option. any ideas? without the /I option I still get a console window, I will look at my code and look for return codes that are not being sent to Vars.
_________________________
WonderBoy
Constantly learning everyday, how much I dont know :-)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#40176 - 2003-05-15 05:01 PM
Re: WKIX32, any issues?
|
j95661
Getting the hang of it
Registered: 2001-02-27
Posts: 84
Loc: sacramento,ca usa
|
I am already logging the info I need to a log file and I'm using redirectoutput for that. Its probably one of my late night ventures with no coffee.
This is off topic but does anyone know of a UDF that builds and array or writes to a text file error levels or return codes. I realise redirectoutput was suggested but I am looking for a more selective output.
_________________________
WonderBoy
Constantly learning everyday, how much I dont know :-)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Jochen, Allen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Arend_, Mart
|
0 registered
and 229 anonymous users online.
|
|
|