#36984 - 2003-02-27 04:55 PM
Re: Bug in KiXtart 4.20 with @HOMESHR
|
Bobby Chan
Fresh Scripter
Registered: 2002-02-07
Posts: 28
Loc: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
Now I have another question. What happens when the KiX RPC service on the DCs are of different versions as the KIX32.exe? What happens then? What about if we want to upgrade versions of KiX? How do we upgrade the KiX RPC service? I'm thinking more in the long run, when we will need to upgrade the KiX engine. Wouldn't there be an extra thing to do now?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#36987 - 2003-02-27 05:10 PM
Re: Bug in KiXtart 4.20 with @HOMESHR
|
Bobby Chan
Fresh Scripter
Registered: 2002-02-07
Posts: 28
Loc: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
I wish we can get all Win9x PCs off the network, unfortunately, it is not that simple.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#36988 - 2003-02-27 08:45 PM
Re: Bug in KiXtart 4.20 with @HOMESHR
|
MCA
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2000-04-28
Posts: 5152
Loc: Netherlands, EU
|
Dear Lonkero,
Of course, also the other kixtart files are important. Of course KXRPC doesn't have a meaning for NT-based systems, but in his first line he was talking about windows9x machines, His logon script doesn't work on those machines.
We advise him to follow the step Kix upgrade: what are those new features? can upgrade be done without any danger?
Upgrading clients can be done very easily with f.e. kix420update.exe upgrade package. greetings.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#36990 - 2003-02-28 01:12 PM
Re: Bug in KiXtart 4.20 with @HOMESHR
|
Bobby Chan
Fresh Scripter
Registered: 2002-02-07
Posts: 28
Loc: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
OK... I just finished installing KiX RPC on all the DCs. Hopefully this will solve our problems. I have my fingers crossed. I will keep you guys updated on the situation.
[Lonkero] I am curious about how you implemented KiX without the need for KiX RPC. Are you running on a NT4 domain or W2K domain model?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Jochen, Allen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Arend_, Mart
|
0 registered
and 1574 anonymous users online.
|
|
|