#208598 - 2014-02-18 02:55 AM
Exchange Alternative
|
NTDOC
Administrator
   
Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11628
Loc: CA
|
Has anyone seriously looked at an alternative to Microsoft Exchange?
Paying these CAL licensing requirements over and over for new Exchange versions when they come out is crazy. 2003 CALS are not valid for 2007, 2007 are not valid for 2010, 2010 are not valid for 2013 - Then you also have Server CALS that are required. I'm a Windows geek like most of us but starting to get cranky about all these update costs to the point I'm seriously starting to look into something else.
Not seeing anything that is 100% free that comes anywhere close to Exchange. One or two that are similar to Exchange but not cheap either. If it was a one time cost and a reasonable yearly support cost maybe but would really like to get away from the $10 - $20K + CALS for Exchange every time you want to update the Server.
Zarafa http://www.zarafa.com/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zarafa_%28software%29
Price is actually not very competitive compared to Exchange Licensing for 500 users has a yearly cost of about $14,000 (Microsoft CALS for 500 users is only about $8,500, and cost of Enterprise for $2,100 or more if you scale up with DAG)
Zarafa needs Cluster aware Linux to scale up, which at that level unless you're a real die-hard Linux person is probably best done with RedHat which also has yearly costs. I just don't see the cost savings to go from Microsoft to Linux/Zarafa (should either be an extensive costs savings or extensive better software offering - neither of which appear to be there)
ClearOS Professional (Not sure it really scales up or is close to Exchange as most replies are from Home users or Tech not using the mail)
http://ns2.centralpointe.com/index.php http://ns2.centralpointe.com/Software/clearos-professional-overview.html
No real business replies where someone is using the email and calendaring portion of the system http://community.spiceworks.com/product/49729-clear-foundation-clearos?source=Selector_73
Possibly this one might be one of the better offerings but still not sure. http://www.sogo.nu/english.html
Even this one if it it's not a yearly renewal fee - one time cost is okay and reasonable yearly support cost but if they want client renewals each year then it too is a useless switch much like Zarafa as I view it.
http://www.icewarp.com/migration/exchange/
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208599 - 2014-02-18 09:21 AM
Re: Exchange Alternative
[Re: NTDOC]
|
Arend_
MM club member
   
Registered: 2005-01-17
Posts: 1896
Loc: Hilversum, The Netherlands
|
I've temporarily looked at Zimbra but haven't really had the time to dive into it yet, but it's VMware backed so that should count for something.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208600 - 2014-02-18 02:42 PM
Re: Exchange Alternative
[Re: Arend_]
|
Allen
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2003-04-19
Posts: 4562
Loc: USA
|
Coming from experience switching folks from Exchange to Google Apps... be careful what you ask for.
I had a number of customers running Small Business Servers that had Exchange 2003 on them. With support running out, the need for better spam protection, amongst other things, we were deciding whether to upgrade Exchange or move to Google Apps, which at the time was free for customers under 50 accounts. I've also setup a few Google Apps accounts for users who have never had Exchange. Their experiences couldn't be any more different.
The migrated Exchange users for the most part were very unhappy. Scheduling, Calendars, Synching were big examples of things that worked completely different and or were missing. Outlook played a big part in this, as it is completely integrated with Exchange. Google Apps... well not so much. They make things work with Outlook, but as example, setting your Vacation Reminder requires a visit to the website rather than a simple setting in Outlook.
The users who never had Exchange, couldn't have been happier. It's all they knew. They had access to things like shared calendars, albeit not in Outlook, but at least they had it.
I realize you are not talking about moving to Google Apps, and I have not looked at any of the solutions you linked to above. I just know you could be going down a road of pain and heartbreak. Your users could very well hate whatever choice you make because they have already had Exchange.
Have you considered Microsoft's hosted Exchange / Office 365? I have no idea what the price difference would be for your situation, but for small offices, it's a near no brainer. Setup was very quick and easy. I have set it up for one of my smaller customers (as a live beta ) , and have to say it works great.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208603 - 2014-02-18 08:22 PM
Re: Exchange Alternative
[Re: NTDOC]
|
Robdutoit
Hey THIS is FUN
 
Registered: 2012-03-27
Posts: 363
Loc: London, England
|
I agree, I would not touch Office 365 with a barge pole for the exact reasons that you mention - loss of control and you still spending pretty much the same amount of money anyway.
I think to answer your question you need to provide us with details. How many users in the organisation, will they access only email and one shared calendar etc etc? In other words what are your organisations requirements.
Most people turn their nose up at Thunderbird but I have to be honest as a mail client it has served me very well for years and I have the ability to VIEW AND EDIT my online calendar within thunderbird. I will be honest and say I have never like Outlook as it is overly complicated for most people's needs.
Why don't you look into Thunderbird as the mail client, an online webcalendar program to put on each client's website and then ask around for a linux solution for a mail server. I am a big fan of Microsoft in terms of Microsoft Windows Servers and Windows 7 Pro clients, but I see no value in Microsoft in the exchange/outlook scenario as it does not provide value for money. Linux is what they had in mind for things like mail servers, websites, proxy servers, caching servers etc. I use Slackware as my preferred Linux distro, but you may find something more standard like Redhat that would suit you. In short, it might pay you to build a solution that works for you. You may have to integrate different technologies to achieve your desired result but it could end up being very worthwhile.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208608 - 2014-02-19 10:24 PM
Re: Exchange Alternative
[Re: Lonkero]
|
Arend_
MM club member
   
Registered: 2005-01-17
Posts: 1896
Loc: Hilversum, The Netherlands
|
Doc, just take a look at this from my last time research this is the most viable alternative to Exchange. If I have some spare time I'll try to set one up and let you know how it works, set you up with an account etc.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208624 - 2014-02-26 04:14 AM
Re: Exchange Alternative
[Re: Arend_]
|
BradV
Seasoned Scripter
  
Registered: 2006-08-16
Posts: 687
Loc: Maryland, USA
|
I did a quick search and found this web page. Linux is really not that hard to set up and manage. CentOS is derived from RHEL. So, you can use it for free. The Citadel software looks promising.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#209485 - 2014-10-04 03:32 PM
Re: Exchange Alternative
[Re: NTDOC]
|
Robdutoit
Hey THIS is FUN
 
Registered: 2012-03-27
Posts: 363
Loc: London, England
|
Hey Doc, I have also had to look into this matter. We currently don't have any type of Exchange environment and I am not keen on Exchange because of cost and difficulty. For small clients its not worth it.
I have found this product, which I am going to trial and I will let you know how it works. It may actually be just what you were looking for if you have not found anything yet. I quite like the product from what I have read.
If you have looked at it and dismissed this product as an option, I would be interested in hearing why.
http://www.altn.com/Products/
Ta Rob
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Arend_, Allen, Jochen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Mart
|
0 registered
and 1003 anonymous users online.
|
|
|