#140149 - 2005-05-23 10:20 AM
Re: doc, it's not ASCII
|
Richard H.
Administrator
   
Registered: 2000-01-24
Posts: 4946
Loc: Leatherhead, Surrey, UK
|
Ok, I'll correct you LOL
Almost all your scripts are ASCII. The fact that the computer operating system you use chooses to store them in an 8 bit word rather than a 7 bit word is not really relevant.
Pass your scripts through a filter using an ASCII mask (& 127) and you will find that they are exactly the same as before.
It's entirely possible that you file may be unicode - again this is down to the way that the operating system decides to store the data, not the data itself.
Of course, if you have used the ALT-Numpad method of keying in characters 128 and above for displaying boxes or currency symbols then they are not true ASCII. They are "extended" ASCII
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#140150 - 2005-05-23 03:41 PM
Re: doc, it's not ASCII
|
Lonkero
KiX Master Guru
   
Registered: 2001-06-05
Posts: 22346
Loc: OK
|
Quote:
The ISO 8859 series defines thirteen character encodings that can represent texts in dozens of languages. Each ISO 8859 character encoding may have up to 256 characters. ISO 8859-1 (Latin-1) comprises the ASCII character set, characters with diacritics (accents, diaereses, cedillas, circumflexes, and so on), and additional symbols.
so, no matter what you say, my scripts are still not written in ASCII. how I know? well, ascii does not "work" with scandinavian characters, which I do use in my scripts.
_________________________
!download KiXnet
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Arend_, Allen, Jochen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Mart
|
0 registered
and 1636 anonymous users online.
|
|
|