#133050 - 2005-01-27 06:35 AM
More 1984
|
NTDOC
Administrator
   
Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11631
Loc: CA
|
Quote:
LONDON - Prime Minister Tony Blair’s government proposed sweeping new powers to tackle terrorism, including electronic tagging, curfews and house arrest for terrorist suspects without trial.
British govt proposes new powers
Isn't that one of the reasons the US fought to be free from Britain? Just got a love it when a Government can tag you or lock you up cause you're on some list even though no court has convicted you or even served you to come before them.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133053 - 2005-01-27 11:33 AM
Re: More 1984
|
Radimus
Moderator
   
Registered: 2000-01-06
Posts: 5187
Loc: Tampa, FL
|
the US has done that for years... al-arian has been locked up in prison for years awaiting trial (in florida)
He WAS a professor at USF, before he was sharged with fundraising activities for PLO, and arrested on secret evidence that only the FBI and a judge got to see.
Don't get me wrong, when I say that IF he has done what they SAY he has done, he deserves it... My problem is the secret aspect of the 'evidence'
You shouldn't have it both ways, if you are going to use the secret evidence, it cannot remain secret any longer.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133055 - 2005-01-28 10:28 AM
Re: More 1984
|
Richard H.
Administrator
   
Registered: 2000-01-24
Posts: 4946
Loc: Leatherhead, Surrey, UK
|
Quote:
Isn't that one of the reasons the US fought to be free from Britain? Just got a love it when a Government can tag you or lock you up cause you're on some list even though no court has convicted you or even served you to come before them.
I think you missed the word "proposes".
You may not be aware that there is an impending General Election in the UK with the weird and not-so-wonderful out to buy^H^H^H earn our votes.
Don't confuse bizzare badly thought out populist statements for law which actually makes it through British Parliamentary debate onto the statute books.
Don't confuse the self-serving activities of a small minority (the Government) with the views of the majority (the British peoples).
Just as in the US we have a democracy. We can either vote for a bunch of arseholes, or we can vote for the other bunch of arseholes.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#184279 - 2007-12-27 10:15 PM
Re: More 1984
[Re: NTDOC]
|
NTDOC
Administrator
   
Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11631
Loc: CA
|
And with Google's new interests in Social Networking to help us all find and track each other's where abouts this picture seems as though it could become a nice addition to our Government logos. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#184580 - 2008-01-15 09:24 PM
Re: More 1984
[Re: NTDOC]
|
NTDOC
Administrator
   
Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11631
Loc: CA
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#186360 - 2008-03-19 09:11 AM
Re: More 1984
[Re: NTDOC]
|
NTDOC
Administrator
   
Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11631
Loc: CA
|
1984 coming closer to you every day
Comcast Wants to Put a Camera in Your Cable Box
Written by Chris Albrecht Posted Tuesday, March 18, 2008 at 11:42 AM PT Comcast Cameras to Start Watching You?
If you have some tinfoil handy, now might be a good time to fashion a hat. At the Digital Living Room conference today, Gerard Kunkel, Comcast’s senior VP of user experience, told me the cable company is experimenting with different camera technologies built into devices so it can know who’s in your living room.
The idea being that if you turn on your cable box, it recognizes you and pulls up shows already in your profile or makes recommendations. If parents are watching TV with their children, for example, parental controls could appear to block certain content from appearing on the screen. Kunkel also said this type of monitoring is the “holy grail” because it could help serve up specifically tailored ads. Yikes.
Kunkel said the system wouldn’t be based on facial recognition, so there wouldn’t be a picture of you on file (we hope). Instead, it would distinguish between different members of your household by recognizing body forms. He stressed that the system is still in the experimental phase, that there hasn’t been consumer testing, and that any rollout “must add value” to the viewing experience beyond serving ads.
Perhaps I’ve seen Enemy of the State too many times, or perhaps I’m just naive about the depths to which Comcast currently tracks my every move. I can’t trust Comcast with BitTorrent, so why should I trust them with my must-be-kept-secret, DVR-clogging addiction to Keeping Up with the Kardashians?
Kunkel also spoke on camera with me about fixing bad Comcast user experiences, the ongoing BitTorrent battle and VOD. But he mostly towed the corporate line on these issues (the monitoring your living room came up after my camera was put away).
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Arend_, Allen, Jochen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Mart
|
0 registered
and 302 anonymous users online.
|
|
|