Page 1 of 1 1
Topic Options
#133050 - 2005-01-27 06:35 AM More 1984
NTDOC Administrator Offline
Administrator
*****

Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11631
Loc: CA
Quote:

LONDON - Prime Minister Tony Blair’s government proposed sweeping new powers to tackle terrorism, including electronic tagging, curfews and house arrest for terrorist suspects without trial.




British govt proposes new powers

Isn't that one of the reasons the US fought to be free from Britain? Just got a love it when a Government can tag you or lock you up cause you're on some list even though no court has convicted you or even served you to come before them.

Top
#133051 - 2005-01-27 10:05 AM Re: More 1984
AzzerShaw Offline
Seasoned Scripter
****

Registered: 2003-02-20
Posts: 510
Loc: Cheltenham, England
What about Guantanamo bay then?
_________________________
If at first you don't succeed, try again. Then quit. There's no use being a damn fool about it. - W.C Fields

Top
#133052 - 2005-01-27 10:19 AM Re: More 1984
NTDOC Administrator Offline
Administrator
*****

Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11631
Loc: CA
Military geeks, not on US soil, but yes, still wrong.
Top
#133053 - 2005-01-27 11:33 AM Re: More 1984
Radimus Moderator Offline
Moderator
*****

Registered: 2000-01-06
Posts: 5187
Loc: Tampa, FL
the US has done that for years... al-arian has been locked up in prison for years awaiting trial (in florida)

He WAS a professor at USF, before he was sharged with fundraising activities for PLO, and arrested on secret evidence that only the FBI and a judge got to see.

Don't get me wrong, when I say that IF he has done what they SAY he has done, he deserves it... My problem is the secret aspect of the 'evidence'

You shouldn't have it both ways, if you are going to use the secret evidence, it cannot remain secret any longer.
_________________________
How to ask questions the smart way <-----------> Before you ask

Top
#133054 - 2005-01-27 06:34 PM Re: More 1984
jtokach Offline
Seasoned Scripter
*****

Registered: 2001-11-15
Posts: 513
Loc: PA, USA
But in the interest of national security it has to. Divulging secrets is not an option. Perhaps a trial by peers who are cleared for access to the related information? The problem is that the way sensitive information is compartmented, the pool of jurors would likely be small.
_________________________
-Jim

...the sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament.

Top
#133055 - 2005-01-28 10:28 AM Re: More 1984
Richard H. Administrator Offline
Administrator
*****

Registered: 2000-01-24
Posts: 4946
Loc: Leatherhead, Surrey, UK
Quote:

Isn't that one of the reasons the US fought to be free from Britain? Just got a love it when a Government can tag you or lock you up cause you're on some list even though no court has convicted you or even served you to come before them.




I think you missed the word "proposes".

You may not be aware that there is an impending General Election in the UK with the weird and not-so-wonderful out to buy^H^H^H earn our votes.

Don't confuse bizzare badly thought out populist statements for law which actually makes it through British Parliamentary debate onto the statute books.

Don't confuse the self-serving activities of a small minority (the Government) with the views of the majority (the British peoples).

Just as in the US we have a democracy. We can either vote for a bunch of arseholes, or we can vote for the other bunch of arseholes.

Top
#133056 - 2005-01-28 05:39 PM Re: More 1984
NTDOC Administrator Offline
Administrator
*****

Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11631
Loc: CA
ROFL

Yeah I know what you mean.

Top
#184279 - 2007-12-27 10:15 PM Re: More 1984 [Re: NTDOC]
NTDOC Administrator Offline
Administrator
*****

Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11631
Loc: CA
And with Google's new interests in Social Networking
to help us all find and track each other's where abouts
this picture seems as though it could become a nice addition to our Government logos.


Top
#184580 - 2008-01-15 09:24 PM Re: More 1984 [Re: NTDOC]
NTDOC Administrator Offline
Administrator
*****

Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11631
Loc: CA
LOL - It just gets better each day.

Plan to play 'Big Brother' with your thermostat downgraded
http://www.eyeoutforyou.com/home/13784392.html

Who Will Control Your Thermostat?
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/01/who_will_control_your_thermost.html

Who controls your thermostat? -- the MSM notices an issue first raised by AT
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/01/who_controls_your_thermostat_t.html

California Seeks Thermostat Control
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/11/us/11control.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=American+Thinker&oref=slogin

Top
#186360 - 2008-03-19 09:11 AM Re: More 1984 [Re: NTDOC]
NTDOC Administrator Offline
Administrator
*****

Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11631
Loc: CA
1984 coming closer to you every day



Comcast Wants to Put a Camera in Your Cable Box
 Quote:
Written by Chris Albrecht
Posted Tuesday, March 18, 2008 at 11:42 AM PT

Comcast Cameras to Start Watching You?

If you have some tinfoil handy, now might be a good time to fashion a hat. At the Digital Living Room conference today, Gerard Kunkel, Comcast’s senior VP of user experience, told me the cable company is experimenting with different camera technologies built into devices so it can know who’s in your living room.

The idea being that if you turn on your cable box, it recognizes you and pulls up shows already in your profile or makes recommendations. If parents are watching TV with their children, for example, parental controls could appear to block certain content from appearing on the screen. Kunkel also said this type of monitoring is the “holy grail” because it could help serve up specifically tailored ads. Yikes.

Kunkel said the system wouldn’t be based on facial recognition, so there wouldn’t be a picture of you on file (we hope). Instead, it would distinguish between different members of your household by recognizing body forms. He stressed that the system is still in the experimental phase, that there hasn’t been consumer testing, and that any rollout “must add value” to the viewing experience beyond serving ads.

Perhaps I’ve seen Enemy of the State too many times, or perhaps I’m just naive about the depths to which Comcast currently tracks my every move. I can’t trust Comcast with BitTorrent, so why should I trust them with my must-be-kept-secret, DVR-clogging addiction to Keeping Up with the Kardashians?

Kunkel also spoke on camera with me about fixing bad Comcast user experiences, the ongoing BitTorrent battle and VOD. But he mostly towed the corporate line on these issues (the monitoring your living room came up after my camera was put away).

Top
#186394 - 2008-03-19 10:59 PM Re: More 1984 [Re: NTDOC]
Les Offline
KiX Master
*****

Registered: 2001-06-11
Posts: 12734
Loc: fortfrances.on.ca
So, if they see you having sex on the sofa, will they offer you porn?
_________________________
Give a man a fish and he will be back for more. Slap him with a fish and he will go away forever.

Top
#186397 - 2008-03-19 11:37 PM Re: More 1984 [Re: Les]
NTDOC Administrator Offline
Administrator
*****

Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11631
Loc: CA
ROFLMAO - I knew someone would ask that question sooner or later.
Top
Page 1 of 1 1


Moderator:  Arend_, Allen, Jochen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Mart 
Hop to:
Shout Box

Who's Online
0 registered and 302 anonymous users online.
Newest Members
Sir_Barrington, batdk82, StuTheCoder, M_Moore, BeeEm
17886 Registered Users

Generated in 0.059 seconds in which 0.023 seconds were spent on a total of 13 queries. Zlib compression enabled.

Search the board with:
superb Board Search
or try with google:
Google
Web kixtart.org