#105120 - 2003-09-26 10:33 PM
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Shawn
Administrator
   
Registered: 1999-08-13
Posts: 8611
|
Actually Hoby, you got me to thinking, your statement:
quote:
Combining assumes that you do not have any duplicate names in different namespaces that actually have different values/purposes which would clash if combined.
is very, very important. To the best of my knowledge, there would be no namespace clashes. But the organization of objects into namespaces certainly does avoid this problem problem though. hmmm ... crap.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
kixforms versions, wtf
|
Lonkero
|
2003-09-26 09:24 AM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Shawn
|
2003-09-26 01:49 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Jochen
|
2003-09-26 01:58 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Lonkero
|
2003-09-26 02:02 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Shawn
|
2003-09-26 02:21 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Chris S.
|
2003-09-26 03:09 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Lonkero
|
2003-09-26 03:38 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Sealeopard
|
2003-09-26 03:54 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Lonkero
|
2003-09-26 04:26 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Shawn
|
2003-09-26 05:22 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Shawn
|
2003-09-26 07:49 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Sealeopard
|
2003-09-26 07:51 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Howard Bullock
|
2003-09-26 07:55 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Shawn
|
2003-09-26 08:18 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Howard Bullock
|
2003-09-26 08:36 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Howard Bullock
|
2003-09-26 08:44 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Shawn
|
2003-09-26 09:54 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Shawn
|
2003-09-26 10:33 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Howard Bullock
|
2003-09-26 10:51 PM
|
Re: kixforms versions, wtf
|
Lonkero
|
2003-09-26 11:19 PM
|
|
Moderator: Arend_, Allen, Jochen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Mart
|
0 registered
and 5803 anonymous users online.
|
|
|