Page 3 of 3 <123
Topic Options
#209809 - 2015-01-09 04:36 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Allen Administrator Online   shocked
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2003-04-19
Posts: 4441
Loc: USA
Ha... was fixing it as you were replying \:\)
Top
#209810 - 2015-01-09 04:41 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Allen]
Jochen Administrator Offline
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2000-03-17
Posts: 6372
Loc: Stuttgart, Germany
\:D
_________________________



Top
#209811 - 2015-01-09 04:43 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Jochen Administrator Offline
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2000-03-17
Posts: 6372
Loc: Stuttgart, Germany
Ok, good work there Allan, thanx a bunch.

I'll let you know our results running from a GPO..
_________________________



Top
#209812 - 2015-01-09 04:59 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Allen Administrator Online   shocked
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2003-04-19
Posts: 4441
Loc: USA
That code just above reintroduced that $exist bug... fixed the post.
Top
#209813 - 2015-01-09 07:41 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Allen]
Jochen Administrator Offline
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2000-03-17
Posts: 6372
Loc: Stuttgart, Germany
just wondering, maybe exploring later on:
Would this work also remotely? Ah the possibilities.
_________________________



Top
#209814 - 2015-01-09 07:45 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Allen Administrator Online   shocked
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2003-04-19
Posts: 4441
Loc: USA
I would say YES...

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa383451%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

Top
#209815 - 2015-01-12 08:42 AM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Allen]
Jochen Administrator Offline
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2000-03-17
Posts: 6372
Loc: Stuttgart, Germany
That was fast ;\)
_________________________



Top
#209878 - 2015-01-26 01:22 AM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Allen Administrator Online   shocked
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2003-04-19
Posts: 4441
Loc: USA
J, you think this thing is ready for posting to the UDFs?
Top
#209879 - 2015-01-26 09:20 AM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Allen]
Jochen Administrator Offline
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2000-03-17
Posts: 6372
Loc: Stuttgart, Germany
oi Allen,

as things usually work, my priorities have changed.
Don't give up, I'll let you know
_________________________



Top
#209896 - 2015-01-30 01:27 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Jochen Administrator Offline
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2000-03-17
Posts: 6372
Loc: Stuttgart, Germany
Hi Allen,

I can confirm that the udf works as gpo script in a 2k8 R2 domain in mixed native mode.
We tested it to be run asynchronously but not yet synchroneously (as we don't have to as of now). And it works as advertised

On a sidenote: We had to pass wkix32.exe kixtart.kix to get it to work, which is kinda odd.



Edited by Jochen (2015-01-30 01:30 PM)
Edit Reason: blargh
_________________________



Top
#209898 - 2015-01-30 09:33 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
NTDOC Administrator Offline
Administrator
*****

Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11564
Loc: CA
What... no 2012 R2 native domain? LOL
Top
#209906 - 2015-02-04 06:00 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: NTDOC]
Jochen Administrator Offline
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2000-03-17
Posts: 6372
Loc: Stuttgart, Germany
Oi Ron,
seems to be the case, yes ... irdc

Apart from that Allens function does work (see last post on page 2)
_________________________



Top
#209935 - 2015-02-07 04:39 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Allen Administrator Online   shocked
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2003-04-19
Posts: 4441
Loc: USA
Thanks Jochen for the feedback. I'll post it up to the UDFs soon. In the header I would like to include an example of how it is used in a GPO script. Did you do anything different than the normal (%Scriptdir%\kix.exe,Scriptname.kix)?
Top
#209937 - 2015-02-09 06:56 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Allen]
Jochen Administrator Offline
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2000-03-17
Posts: 6372
Loc: Stuttgart, Germany
Hi Allen,
as our AD guy is on a 4 week vacation in the states, and none of the others is involved in that, I'll have to verify myself.
If time allows, I'll post you an update on this soon, this week, probably even..
Yes!
_________________________



Top
#210029 - 2015-03-03 04:43 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Jochen Administrator Offline
KiX Supporter
*****

Registered: 2000-03-17
Posts: 6372
Loc: Stuttgart, Germany
Oi Allen,

been a long time, but fear not, I shan't forget thee!

Ok, he tested successfully as GPO script ...\sysvol\blah\etc.. :

Seems odd, but he did not manage to get it to run without the script parameter, so he had to make it as stated:
wkix32 kixtart.kix
oh yeah, and as already stated on page 2 of this thread it runs asynchroneously (which is totally ok for our needs)

Anything else?
_________________________



Top
Page 3 of 3 <123


Moderator:  Jochen, Allen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Arend_, Mart 
Hop to:
Shout Box

Who's Online
0 registered and 166 anonymous users online.
Newest Members
amelindarķe, Nims123, davidscroegh, davidscroe, DFGHJGH
17625 Registered Users

Generated in 0.086 seconds in which 0.031 seconds were spent on a total of 14 queries. Zlib compression enabled.

Search the board with:
superb Board Search
or try with google:
Google
Web kixtart.org